Dr. Kolade Weighs In On The Pros And Cons Of Synthetic Pitches
Dr. Kolade Kolapo, a respected medical professional from the General Outpatient Department GOPD of Codic Specialist Medical Center, has provided an insightful analysis of synthetic pitches, highlighting both their benefits and drawbacks.
Synthetic pitches are popular for their promise of low maintenance and year round usability. Proper installation requires creating a surface that is porous, flat and allows good drainage. DIY installations can lead to issues like stagnant water and unpleasant odours.
The initial cost of high quality synthetic turf, along with necessary accessories, can be substantial. Buyers must plan meticulously to avoid unforeseen expenses.
Synthetic pitches generally have lower shock absorption than natural grass, leading to increased foot pain and discomfort. The compacting of infill material over time can harden the surface and increase the risk of injuries. Excessive friction can cause stress on players’ muscles, bones, and joints, increasing the risk of ligament injuries, especially for heavier players.
These stadiums feature hybrid synthetic pitches that meet international standards and have received certification from the Confederation of African Football CAF. They are known for their excellent playing surfaces and comprehensive facilities.
Editorial
The insights provided by Dr. Kolade Kolapo offer a balanced perspective on synthetic pitches, emphasizing the need for careful consideration of their benefits and drawbacks. While synthetic pitches offer the advantage of low maintenance and year round usability, the complexities of installation and financial costs cannot be overlooked.
The health implications for players are particularly concerning. Lower shock absorption and increased friction can lead to various injuries, highlighting the need for proper maintenance and consideration of player safety.
Dr. Kolade Kolapo, a respected medical professional from the General Outpatient Department GOPD of Codic Specialist Medical Center, has provided an insightful analysis of synthetic pitches, highlighting both their benefits and drawbacks.
Synthetic pitches are popular for their promise of low maintenance and year round usability. Proper installation requires creating a surface that is porous, flat and allows good drainage. DIY installations can lead to issues like stagnant water and unpleasant odours.
The initial cost of high quality synthetic turf, along with necessary accessories, can be substantial. Buyers must plan meticulously to avoid unforeseen expenses.
Synthetic pitches generally have lower shock absorption than natural grass, leading to increased foot pain and discomfort. The compacting of infill material over time can harden the surface and increase the risk of injuries. Excessive friction can cause stress on players’ muscles, bones, and joints, increasing the risk of ligament injuries, especially for heavier players.
These stadiums feature hybrid synthetic pitches that meet international standards and have received certification from the Confederation of African Football CAF. They are known for their excellent playing surfaces and comprehensive facilities.
Editorial
The insights provided by Dr. Kolade Kolapo offer a balanced perspective on synthetic pitches, emphasizing the need for careful consideration of their benefits and drawbacks. While synthetic pitches offer the advantage of low maintenance and year round usability, the complexities of installation and financial costs cannot be overlooked.
The health implications for players are particularly concerning. Lower shock absorption and increased friction can lead to various injuries, highlighting the need for proper maintenance and consideration of player safety.